Darvas

A hot market; GMI: +6; more rockets; covered calls on GOOG

@ 11:15 pm

To my visitors: I am only one trader, not a guru, and not a financial advisor.  I am presenting my own opinions and my own experiences and people are welcome to decide for themselves what, if anything, on this site is of value to them.  Please refer to the additional comments, highlighted in red, at the end of this post.

This is one hot market!  There were 629 new highs (16%) in my universe of 4,000 stocks today.  Gmi711 The GMI remains at +6 and 83% of the stocks closed above their 10 week averages.  I changed the criterion for the 10 day new high index to be positive if there were 100 successful stocks or at least 50% of the stocks that hit a new high 10 days ago closed higher today than 10 days ago.  There were only 95 new highs 10 days ago, so the indicator would have had to be negative (less than 100) the way I originally defined the index.  So today, 76/95 stocks or 80% qualified as successful 10 day new highs.  60% of the Nasdaq 100 stocks are in a short term up trend and 73% to 78% of the Nasdaq 100, S&P 500 and Dow 30 stocks rose today.   These advancing percentages are lower than yesterday’s, but still very respectable……………………………………………

I received a lot of nice reader feedback today–thank you!!  I will address many of the issues you raised, in coming weeks………………………………………

I found a really neat description of a market scan used by a successful newsletter, Coolcat.  Many of the stocks listed are those I have spotted.  Note this scan for finding great microcaps uses some of the types of technical criteria I (and Nicolas Darvas)  use to define rockets–new highs and huge price appreciation.  As I wrote in my strategy posts on 4/23 and 4/30 (check the archive), to find a stock that will double, find one that has already doubled.

My rocket scan found loads of promising stocks today.  All of these had triple digit earnings increases last quarter and are at new price peaks:  CNXS, LUB, BOOM, NDAQ, TS, NTRI, BMHC,  CPSI, LUFK, HANS, RIV, KOSP, SPTN, RTI, TU, PTRY, SNHY, HOLX, SE, WCG, TUG, PCO, VDSI, BEBE, SMTS.  Check them out.  When I buy strong momentum stocks like this, I make a small pilot buy and put a stop loss order in below support or below a moving average where it has found support.  I then wait to see if it moves up and I slowly add more on the way up, as long as the GMI is strong……………………………..

Ever write a covered call in your IRA account?  Today, I bought 100 shares of GOOG at 295.74.  I then immediately sold a call for someone to buy my 100 shares from me at 300 per share, good through expiration on August 19.  In return for the right to buy my GOOG from me at 300 during this period I was paid 15.80 per share, or $1580.  What this means is that by option expiration in August, if GOOG is selling above $300, the option will be exercised and the stock will be called away from me for $300 per share.  My profit (excluding commissions would be 30,000-29,574= +426 + 1580= $2006 or 7% in about 6 weeks.  I am giving up the right to make anymore than this no matter how much above 300 that GOOG may climb during this period.  On the other hand, if GOOG should decline during this period I would not have a loss until it fell to 279.94 (295.74-15.80).  The option premium of 15.84 per share is mine to keep and protects me from a loss on my purchase down to 279.94.  As long as GOOG closes above 279.94 by the August expiration I will have a profit.  If GOOG closes below $300 in August, the option expires worthless and I can write a new call on the same shares for September or later. If the stock falls a lot more than 15.80, I could have a large loss.

Covered call writing is really a very conservative strategy.  I only sell calls on stocks that I think will rise and which are so volatile that the option premium (amount someone will pay me for the option) is considerable.  I do not want to buy GOOG without the protection of the covered call, so I do not care if the stock goes way above 300 by August.  Check out covered call writing in the CBOE learning center.  Many people of the "buy and hold" mentality could have limited their losses in 2000-2002 if they simply had written calls on their stocks as they declined. If you use a full service broker and s/he did not tell you about covered calls as your portfolio shrunk, you should liquidate your broker instead of your account.

Send me your feedback at: silentknight@wishingwealthblog.com.

Please remember that the stock market is a risky place, especially now.  I am not providing recommendations for you to follow.  My goal is to share tools and methods that I have used over the past 40 years of trading, so that you may learn from them and adapt them to your trading style and needs.  While I do my best, I do not guarantee the accuracy of any statistics computed or any resources linked to my blog.  Please consult with your financial adviser and a mental health practitioner before you enter the stock market,  and please do not take unaffordable risks in the current market environment.  See the About section for more statements designed to protect you (and me) as you navigate this market. Past performance does not guarantee future results, but I would rather learn from a former winner than a loser.

GMI: +3; Cramer defines Madmoney amid weak picks; I’m buying puts

@ 11:00 pm

To my visitors: I am only one trader, not a guru, and not a financial advisor.  I am presenting my own opinions and my own experiences and people are welcome to decide for themselves what, if anything, on this site is of value to them.  Please refer to the additional comments, highlighted in red, at the end of this post.

I made it back from vacation in time to post tonight.  Are you convinced yet that we are in a decline–day 5 (D-5) to be exact?  Yes, I did sell my CME too soon, it soared 50 points after I sold it.  If I had not planned to be away from the market part of this week, I would have been content to just set close sell stops.  Gmi630 But with the GMI weakening, I did not want to risk losing any of my profit from this relatively short rally. We remain at +3 with the indexes rapidly weakening.  Only 16% of the Nasdaq 100 stocks rose today, along with 27% of the S&P 500 and 7% (2) of the Dow 30 stocks. Note that less than one half (121 or 42%) of the 291 stocks that hit a new high 10 days ago closed higher today than 10 days ago.  71% of the stocks in my universe of 4,000 closed above their 10 week average. 

While on vacation, I watched Cramer yesterday warn his audience that "madmoney" pertains only to extra funds that a person has–excluding pensions, IRA’s and 529 plans.  Gis In other words, don’t speculate with those assets which you need for the future and can’t risk.  I think maybe he is retreating in the face of some of his disastrous picks.  Take a look at General Mills, one of his "safe" stocks that he has been touting for weeks as a defensive stock. We all need to own safe, defensive stocks like this. I guess Cramer would call GIS a "bargain" now. If you don’t like this one, take MSFT or CSCO or DIS, other Cramer picks that have weak charts.  (He did get CME and GOOG right thus far, however.)

I am critical of Cramer because I think he is misinforming the public.  He tells everyone never to use market orders-just use limit orders.  But he fails to add that a limit order may fail to get you out of a rapidly declining stock.  (If you place an order to sell a stock at a limit of 20–$20 or better—-you will not be sold out if the stock opens below 20 and keeps declining.  This is why the really successful traders use stop orders that get them out of a stock at market– next best price available. When things turn bad, I want to get out immediately, and do not quibble about getting the extra nickel or dime or quarter per share. So what if the broker rips off a few more pennies, as Cramer claims–I lose much more if I fail to buy a rocket or sell a loser.

And then Cramer has the audacity to say that he has tried all of the analytic software and it does not work.  Charting is worthless–you need to concentrate on fundamentals, he says.  Well, first of all, most people do not equate technical analysis with mindless software programs that replace the trader’s insights with automatic buys and sells.  And most successful technical analysts (O’Neil, Darvas, Weinstein, Livermore–check out the book listed to the right by John Boik) incorporate fundamental analysis with their chart patterns.  You can have a great company, but if no one discovers it or if it takes years, it is not going to make you a fortune in your lifetime. The charts help me to time my buys and sells and to discriminate between promising stocks.

Finally, I think that it is irresponsible to urge people to buy more of the same stock as it declines.  The great successful gurus all tell people NEVER to average down, to spend good money after bad.  I think I know why Cramer preaches what he does.  He is among the few lucky persons who built their fortune in the great market bubble of the late 90’s.  During that time one could buy a tech stock as it fell and then be saved as the market climbed to a new peak.  (However, note that Cramer had to be saved by his wife, the trading goddess, a number of times when his losing positions almost drove him out of business.)  But TODAY, gone are the days of the bull stampede when you could buy a declining tech stock knowing that a crowd of greater fools would eventually buy it back from you.  Cramer’s methods are simply out of step with the post-bubble, less bullish market environment……………………….

So, I am mostly in cash.  I do own puts on a stock and on a market index.  This year could turn out to be typical of post-election years that are followed by a year of miserable stock market performance.

Send your feedback and questions to: silentknight@wishingwealthblog.com.

Please remember that the stock market is a risky place, especially now.  I am not providing recommendations for you to follow.  My goal is to share tools and methods that I have used over the past 40 years of trading, so that you may learn from them and adapt them to your trading style and needs.  While I do my best, I do not guarantee the accuracy of any statistics computed or any resources linked to my blog.  Please consult with your financial adviser and a mental health practitioner before you enter the stock market,  and please do not take unaffordable risks in the current market environment.  See the About section for more statements designed to protect you (and me) as you navigate this market. Past performance does not guarantee future results, but I would rather learn from a former winner than a loser.

A mixed day, trend-followers, GMI: +5

@ 10:00 pm

To my visitors: I am only one trader, not a guru, and not a financial advisor.  I am presenting my own opinions and my own experiences and people are welcome to decide for themselves what, if anything, on this site is of value to them.  Please refer to the additional comments, highlighted in red, at the end of this post.

Today was a mixed day, and the GMI remains at +5, as we complete day 17 of this QQQQ uptrend (U-17).  Gmi531 There were 35 successful 10 day new highs and only 11 "successful" new lows.  More than 70% of the 49 stocks that hit new highs 10 days ago, closed higher today than they closed 10 days ago.  There were 155 new 52 week highs in my universe of nearly 4,000 stocks, and only 23 new lows.  What is somewhat troubling is that only 36% of the Nasdaq 100 stocks rose today, 32% of the S&P 500 stocks and only 7% (2) of the 30 Dow stocks.  So, while there were a large number of new highs, most stocks did not rise today.

Still, some of the stocks I have been discussing hit new highs today, including GOOG, BOOM, NSI, MW, PNRA  (I own some of these).  A sign of a bull market top is weakness in the leaders.  We will therefore continue to monitor these stocks for any signs of weakness–clearly they are still very strong.  Moreover, given the strength of the GMI, I am not in a defensive mode yet.  It will be interesting to see whether the market can bounce back tomorrow……………………………………..

In my prior post, I said I was an orthodox agnostic when it came to believing in a rationale for market moves.  Since then I read an interview in Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities, June edition, with Michael W. Covel.  Mr. Covel recently published the book, Trend Following: How Great Traders Make Millions in Up or Down Markets. In the interview, Covel says, "A trend-follower doesn’t need to know the "why" of market behavior during trends.  They just need to know the price.  A lot of trend-followers don’t even want the name of the markets.  They just want the price data and they can tell you whether they can trade it by the price data alone.  I think this kind of mentality is odd to most people."(p. 55)

I guess Darvas, Livermore, O’Neil and a host of other gurus would be called trend-followers today.  I don’t feel so weird about my orthodox agnostic comment anymore.  I am in good company.  However, Covel is describing the most extreme case of trend following, someone who needs no fundamental information about a stock other than its price and volume–an approach we call in my field, blind empiricism.  Most of the successful gurus I admire wanted to trade with the trend, but also factored in other information about the company’s profitability and industry.  By the way, I was disappointed with Covel’s book.  It merely makes the case that specific trend-followers have been successful, without providing any details of how these people achieved their success. Borrow it from your local library.

Send me your feedback at silentknight@wishingwealthblog.com

Please remember that the stock market is a risky place, especially now.  I am not providing recommendations for you to follow.  My goal is to share tools and methods that I have used over the past 40 years of trading, so that you may learn from them and adapt them to your trading style and needs.  While I do my best, I do not guarantee the accuracy of any statistics computed or any resources linked to my blog.  Please consult with your financial adviser and a mental health practitioner before you enter the stock market,  and please do not take unaffordable risks in the current market environment.  See the About section for more statements designed to protect you (and me) as you navigate this market. Past performance does not guarantee future results, but I would rather learn from a former winner than a loser.