GMI: 0; GMI-S: 50; Real turn?

The GMI is still zero, although the GMI-S rose to 50.  One half of my short term indicators for the four indexes are positive.  The QQQQ is still the laggard.  Gmi0719 86% of the Nasdaq 100 stocks rose on Wednesday, compared with 93% of the S&P 500 and 97% of the Dow 30 stocks.  90% of my universe of stocks rose as did 94% of the IBD 100 list from 5/15.  There were 82 new yearly highs and 38 new lows in my universe of 4,000 stocks.  A TC2005 scan of the market found 14 rockets and 458 submarines, indicating that there are still many more stocks in confirmed down trends.  The QQQQ, currently at 36.62, has a long way to go (consecutive closes above 38.50) before it would convince me that a meaningful change in trend has occurred in growth stocks.  Time will tell.

Please send your comments to:  silentknight@wishingwealthblog.com.

GMI: 0; 100% cash

The GMI is still zero and a long way from turning positive.  There were 23 new highs and 257 new lows on Tuesday in my universe of 4,000 stocks.  Gmi0718 54% of the Nasdaq 100 stocks, 52% of the S&P 500 stocks and 73% of the Dow 30 stocks advanced.  The 50 day average of the IBD mutual fund index is about to cross below the 200 day average, indicating that managers of growth stocks funds are doing poorly.  When that happens, I also do not do well holding growth stocks.  With the major indexes below their 30 week averages (never mind their 30 day averages) the markets remain in sustained down trends.  Tuesday was the ninth day (D-9) of the current QQQQ short term down trend.  However, the QQQQ has closed below its 10 week average for nine weeks.  I typically make profitable long trades when the QQQQ  remains above its rising 10 week average.  The GMI indicators have kept me out of all major market declines since 1995.  I remain 100% in cash as I prepare to go on vacation until early August.

Please send your comments to:  silentknight@wishingwealthblog.com.

GMI: 0; Indicators deteriorate; On biased market indexes

The GMI is still zero, as the markets weakened a lot more than was reflected in the major indexes. 50-54% of the stocks in the Nasdaq 100, S&P 500 and D0w 30 indexes advanced on Monday, but only 36% of my universe of 4,000 stocks rose, along with just 23% of the stocks in the IBD 100 list on 5/15.  Thus, it was the large cap stocks reflected in the big indexes that were most likely to rise on Monday.    There were only 16 new highs and 195 new lows in my universe of stocks.  Gmi0717 Only 19% of the 132 stocks that hit a new high 10 days ago closed higher on Monday than they closed 10 days ago.  Buying stocks at new highs has not been profitable.  Tuesday was the eighth day (D-8) in the current QQQQ decline.  I would have expected a much larger rebound after the considerable declines of last week……

The deterioration in many of my indicators is evident in the chart of the performance of my universe of 4,000 stocks versus the IBD 100 stocks of 5/15.  Ibd0717 Only 23% of my universe and 29% of the IBD 100 stocks of 5/15 remain in a short term up-trend.  Only 18% of the IBD 100 stocks of 5/15 are above their 10 week averages and only 14% (14/100) of them closed higher on Monday than they closed on the day this list of the IBD 100 was published on 5/15.  More telling, 48% of the IBD 100 stocks posted on 5/15 are down 15% or more from the day that list was posted on 5/15……..

My intent is not to question the value of the IBD 100 list in bull markets.  IBD 100 type growth stocks tend to do very well in rising markets. However, I am trying to protect my readers from impulsively buying the IBD 100 list growth stocks when they are listed in weak markets.  IBD itself cautions readers to buy these stocks only in a rising market and after careful analysis.  In addition, I want my readers to know that IBD’s practice of replacing underperforming stocks in the IBD 100 index with better performing stocks obscures the performance of any complete list of stocks they publish.  That is why I arbitrarily selected  the IBD 100 stock list published on 5/15 and track its performance. Anyone who bought stocks on that list on 5/15 and held them had a 14/100 chance of having a winner, through yesterday’s close. In a few months I will select a new IBD 100 list to track.

IBD is not alone in replacing underperforming stocks in an index.  All of the major indexes follow the same practice, thus providing the brokerage industry with a very misleading tool for convincing  investors of the  wisdom of buying and holding stocks for the long term.  (For example, only one original Dow Industrial stock, GE, remains in that index.)  Anyone who bought and held the stocks that have been dropped from these indexes might have seriously harmed their financial health, and wealth. Statistics based on the performance of these "corrected" indexes are therefore heavily biased towards gains and do not accurately represent the risk of holding stocks over time…….

Please send your comments to:  silentknight@wishingwealthblog.com.